Comparison of Different Pond Liner Materials (Which Is Best?)

We are 100% reader supported. We may earn commission at no extra cost to you if you buy through a link on this page. Read our disclosure.

Share this page!

pictures of different pond liner materials
There are many different pond liner materials, and choosing the correct one is possibly the most important aspect of pond construction. Public domain.

Every pond liner’s primary job is to hold your pond’s water. However, manufacturers make flexible liners — often called “geomembranes” by engineers — with a wide variety of materials, each of which has pros and cons depending on a pond’s individual setup. Your liner needs to stay stable in the hottest and coldest temperatures your area is likely to experience, and it shouldn’t snag, puncture, or tear due to objects or irregularities in the ground underneath. If your liner is exposed, it has to stand up to both UV rays and harsh weather.

Chemical resistance, flexibility, cost, and toxicity to fish can all vary as well. Many geomembrane liners are designed for large lakes or landfills, and as a result they may not perform as well in smaller backyard ponds. For these reasons, it pays to know a little about different liner materials before you invest in one.

How Are Pond Liners Made & Installed?

pond lake liner material comparison
Pond liners can be purchased in pre-cut materials, or can be custom manufactured for more specific or larger projects. Public domain.

Pond liners are large, foldable sheets made of either plastic or synthetic rubber. Depending on the material, some companies can custom manufacture liners for individual ponds in-factory. In other cases, you’ll have to hire professionals to form a complete pond liner by joining multiple sheets in the field using methods like welding or taping. A liner material’s pliability, weight, and thickness all influence how difficult it is to install and what you can do with it.

The material you choose should balance these traits in the way that works best for your pond. Your liner should be flexible enough to mold to conform to the contours of your pond, but not liable to stretch to the point of deformity. Thicker liners may last longer in general, but thicker doesn’t always mean stronger. And a liner’s UV and ozone resistance may determine whether you need to cover it or can leave it exposed.

Detailed Pond Liner Material Comparison (Advantages & Disadvantages)

1) HDPE (high density polyethylene)

If you’re looking to line a large pond or lake, you’ll want to consider models made with high density polyethylene (HDPE) plastic. HDPE has very good UV resistance and functions well in cold temperatures. It’s also strong and very stiff, meaning that it’s not prone to sudden length-wise tears. HDPE’s most desirable characteristic, though, might be its superior resistance to a wide range of chemicals. This combined with its relatively inexpensive price (an average of $0.62/square foot in the US, according to HomeAdvisor) and the fact that multiple sheets can be joined using welding have historically made HDPE one of the most popular geomembrane types worldwide. HDPE liners are commonly used in landfills and chemical containment sites, but they are also safe and well-suited for fish ponds. No matter where they are, HDPE liners are very durable, having been found to last upwards of 36 years when covered.

Unfortunately, HDPE liners are far from perfect. Because they’re stiff and fairly heavy, HDPE liners can be expensive to ship and can’t be custom shaped or assembled in a factory. Instead, you’ll have to pay extra installation costs to have them installed on-site by professionals. These expenses make HDPE liners most cost-effective for larger ponds.

HDPE’s lack of flexibility can also make installation more difficult in general, and at extremely high temperatures it can expand and become loose. You’ll have to be careful when installing an HDPE geomembrane on rough terrain, since the material is vulnerable to punctures, and surface scratches that can become cracks over time. In fact, some research suggests that a tendency toward stress cracking, which is caused by low-grade pressure applied over long periods, is HDPE’s greatest weakness.

HDPE Liners
  • Excellent chemical resistance
  • Good UV resistance
  • Relatively inexpensive
  • Weldable
  • Fish safe
  • Very durable
  • 36+-year lifespan when covered
  • Performs well in cold temperatures
  • Poor flexibility
  • Susceptible to puncture
  • Heavy weight makes it more expensive to ship, difficult to install
  • No custom fabrication; must be welded on-location
  • Prone to scratches from rough surfaces
  • Poor resistance to stress cracking
  • May expand in very high temperatures

2) LLDPE (low density polyethylene)

Given that they’re made from the same plastic, it’s no surprise that linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and HDPE liners have several things in common. These liner types share the same fairly inexpensive price, and both have to be seamed from multiple sheets in the field by professionals, rather than custom-fabricated in the factory. Like HDPE, LLDPE is weldable, nontoxic to fish, and functions well in in typical pondwater temperatures, though it’s also commonly used in liners that are intended to contain water contaminated with waste or hazardous chemicals.

LLDPE has one major advantage over HDPE, though. Because LLDPE liners aren’t as dense as their HDPE cousins, they’re softer, more flexible, and more pliable. This makes LLDPE liners much easier to install, as well as to mold around corners and tight nooks and crannies. LLDPE’s pliability also means that liners made from it can conform more closely to rough terrain than HDPE liners can, with fewer wrinkles. Because it’s softer, LLDPE is also somewhat less prone to stress cracking than HDPE.

Unfortunately, this softness comes at a price. LLDPE liners have less tensile strength than HDPE liners, meaning they’re more susceptible to length-wise deformation and tears. Geomembranes made from LLDPE are also not quite as resistant to UV rays, chemicals, and oxidation as those made from HDPE. Consequently, LLDPE liners may not be as durable when exposed to the elements (when used as recommended, LLDPE liners may last up to 36 years).

LLDPE Liners
  • More flexible, easier to stretch, and conform better to uneven terrain than HDPE
  • Easier to install than HDPE, especially around corners
  • Relatively inexpensive
  • Weldable
  • Fish safe
  • Very durable
  • 36-year lifespan when covered
  • Decent UV, chemical resistance
  • Less prone to stress cracking than HDPE
  • Susceptible to length-wise tears and permanent deformation
  • Heavy weight makes it more expensive to ship, difficult to install
  • No custom fabrication; must be welded on-location
  • Not quite as resistant to UV rays, chemicals, and oxidation as HDPE liners
  • May expand in very high temperatures

3) RPE (reinforced polyethylene)

Reinforced polyethylene (RPE) provides almost all of the same benefits as HDPE and LLDPE without many of their flaws. Because RPE is reinforced, it’s much one of the most durable liner materials you can buy; it’s certainly stronger and more puncture resistant than either LLDPE or HDPE, even though all three are made from the same plastic. RPE liners are also much thinner than HDPE, LLDPE, and liners from other materials like PVC and EPDM. Add in the fact that RPE liners can weigh up to two-thirds less than other geomembranes, and it’s easy to see why they’re easier and less expensive to ship and install in larger pieces.

Like HDPE and LLDPE liners, RPE geomembranes are weldable, fish safe, and fairly resistant to chemicals and UV rays. RPE liners are stiffer than materials like LLDPE, but they should still fold adequately around most corners in your pond. Outside of the pond industry, you’re most likely to find RPE lining waterbodies like canals and dams.

The only real downside to RPE liners is that they’re more expensive than their HDPE and LLDPE counterparts (an average of $0.84/square foot in the US, according to HomeAdvisor). This makes sense considering that RPE liners require more effort to make and are generally of higher quality than HDPE or LLDPE liners. It’s also worth noting that, because RPE liners are fairly new to the market, there’s little research about their expected lifespan. Some companies claim their RPE products can last up to 40 years when covered, but warranties beyond 20 years are rare. When exposed to sun and weather, RPE liners may last 3–5 years. More time is needed to determine if they have similar lifespans to their LLDPE and HDPE cousins.

RPE Liners
  • Extremely durable
  • Strong and puncture resistant
  • Thinner and lighter than other liners, making them easier to ship and install
  • Weldable
  • Fish safe
  • Good UV, chemical resistance
  • Fairly foldable
  • Relatively stiff
  • More expensive than other types of liner
  • Lack of research on expected lifespan

4) fPP (flexible polypropylene)

If your pond liner priorities are physical strength and plasticity, then flexible polypropylene (fPP) is definitely worth considering. As the name suggests, fPP liners are very innately flexible without the need for additives like plasticizers. As a result, they can be easily molded and formed to fit your pond’s tightest corners and recesses. fPP geomembranes can also conform tightly to even extremely irregular surfaces, giving them good gripping power against pond slopes and rough terrain. Liners made from fPP can take a lot of strain from different angles and stretch without breaking or deforming, making them fairly resistant to tears, scratches, and punctures. They even remain pliable until -50°C, making them more than suitable for ponds in temperate climates.

fPP liners are heat-treatable and can be seamed through welding. They don’t expand as much in heat as HDPE or LLDPE liners do, though. This means that fPP geomembranes have a wider range of temperatures over which they can successfully welded, making them easier to seam. Also, unlike HDPE and LLDPE liners, fPP liners can be custom-assembled in large pieces and folded up in the factory, which can be advantageous when you’re looking to line a uniquely shaped pond. fPP products are fish safe, moderately priced, and have a lifespan of up to 30 years when covered.

Although fPP liners are resistant to UV rays and many chemicals, there are a few substances that they fall short against. They’re particularly vulnerable to a class of chemicals called hydrocarbons (which includes substances like benzene), as well as chlorine-containing chemicals, oils (including animal fats), and strong oxidants. When exposed to this last type of chemical, fPP liners may develop oxidative damage, including stress cracking along folds and wrinkles. This likely won’t be a problem in most garden fish ponds, but it’s worth keeping in mind if you’re interested in using fPP for a larger application. Outside the pond industry, fPP geomembranes are commonly used to line canals, containers for drinking water and horticulture, and earthen dams.

fPP Liners
  • Extremely flexible and foldable
  • Can conform tightly to rough terrain
  • Fairly resistant to punctures and tears
  • Stay flexible in low temperatures
  • Easier to weld pieces together compared to HDPE and LLDPE liners
  • Can be custom-assembled in the factory
  • Good for unique pond shapes
  • Fish safe
  • Good UV, chemical resistance
  • 30-year lifespan when covered
  • Vulnerable to hydrocarbons, chlorine-containing chemicals, animal fats and other oils
  • Susceptible to oxidative damage, including stress cracking along folds and wrinkles

5) PVC (polyvinyl chloride)

Many people associate polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with pipes and plumbing, but it’s also one of the oldest and most popular pond liner materials. Two of PVC’s biggest selling points are its very low price (an average of $0.65/square foot in the US, according to HomeAdvisor) and its exceptional flexibility. Like fPP geomembranes, PVC liners can conform snugly to tight corners and crevices, and can be fit tightly over coarse surfaces with little difficulty. Additionally, they can be seamed and folded as needed without risking stress cracking. These traits make PVC liners among the easiest to work with and install — an especially big plus if you’re planning to install your liner yourself.

PVC liners also have great chemical resistance and are moderately strong against tears and punctures. Sheets of PVC are weldable but can also be joined using adhesives like liner tape or glue.  Most PVC seaming and assembling can be done in the factory of the company you buy from, but some on-field seaming may be necessary depending on the size of the sheets you order.

Unfortunately, PVC liners have a few big shortcomings. For one, PVC liners frequently aren’t fish safe. PVC isn’t naturally flexible, and the plasticizers and other additives included to it to make it that way are often toxic and prone to leach into pondwater. If you’re interested in using a PVC liner in a fish pond, you’ll need to look for varieties that are specifically formulated to be safe for aquatic life. PVC liners also have inferior ozone and UV resistance, and, as a result, they could experience premature degradation unless they’re buried under at least 12″ of sediment (when covered, PVC geomembranes can last between 18 and 32 years, depending on the plasticizers used). This can be a hassle, especially for owners of smaller ponds.

Finally, PVC liners don’t function well at very high or low temperatures; in particularly cold climates, they may be susceptible to cracks and splits. These flaws don’t necessarily mean that you shouldn’t consider a PVC liner for your fish pond, but it would probably be a good idea to weigh them against the material’s low cost and ease of installation.

PVC Liners
  • Extremely flexible and foldable
  • Can closely grip even rough surfaces
  • Great chemical resistance
  • Very inexpensive
  • Very easy to seam and install
  • Weldable
  • Can usually be custom-assembled in the factory
  • 18–30-year lifespan when covered
  • Not always safe for fishponds (check for fish safe varieties)
  • Weak against ozone, UV rays, and weathering
  • Can experience significant premature degradation unless buried under 12″ of sediment
  • Does not work as well at very high or low temperatures

6) EPDM (Ethylene propylene diene monomer)

Ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber, or EPDM, is a synthetic rubber and one of the most popular geomembrane materials used for lining ponds. EPDM liners are soft but durable, giving them a nice balance of flexibility and toughness. This allows them to stretch without losing strength, conform tightly around curves and corners, and lay flat against a pond’s bottoms and sides. Compared to other liner materials, EPDM doesn’t expand or contract much at high and low temperatures, meaning that extreme temperature differences won’t cause it to lose its close grip on a rough surface. Liners made of this material are especially resilient against the cold and are at little risk of cracking at low temperatures. Despite its softness, EPDM is also moderately puncture resistant and has good endurance against UV rays, ozone, and weathering. EPDM liners’ strength gives them a lifespan of 27 years or more when covered, and they’re nontoxic to fish.

Before you jump to buy a roll of EPDM, though, consider the material’s few drawbacks. EPDM is thermoset, which means that although liners made from it perform well at high and low temperatures, they can’t be welded without losing quality. To seam pieces of EPDM liner together, you (or the professionals you hire) will have to use adhesives like tape. EPDM liners also have poor overall chemical resistance and are particularly vulnerable to degradation from oils and solvents, although this likely won’t be a problem for a typical garden pond.

What could be an issue for anyone, though, is that EPDM geomembranes are relatively heavy, which could result in high shipping fees. And at an average price of $0.84/square foot in the US, according to HomeAdvisor, EPDM liners are already comparatively expensive. EPDM liners are still extremely well-suited for custom fish ponds both large and small, but you should be sure you can account for these issues before you make your purchase.

EPDM Liners
  • Very soft and flexible, good for custom-shaped ponds
  • High strength
  • Can closely grip even rough surfaces
  • Reliable in very high and low temperatures
  • Good UV, ozone, and weather resistance
  • Safe for fishponds
  • Lifespan of 27+ years when covered
  • Can’t be welded; pieces need to be seamed together with adhesives
  • Inferior overall chemical resistance
  • Particularly vulnerable to degradation from oils and solvents
  • Heavy, which may raise shipping costs
  • More expensive than other liner materials

7) Butyl 

Butyl (synthetic) rubber has been one of the most widely used pond liner materials in the UK for decades. Like its synthetic rubber sibling EPDM, butyl is highly flexible and easy to mold to the tight spaces in a custom pond. Butyl liners are also very durable, as they are resilient to UV radiation, ozone, and weathering. This perhaps lends credence to the many manufacturers who claim their butyl rubber products have lifespans of up to 50 years, presumably covered (if that seems dubious to you, consider that warranties beyond 20 years are rare). Butyl geomembranes are also similar to EPDM liners in that they are nontoxic to fish and function well in both very high and low temperatures.

Unfortunately, another property that butyl shares with EPDM is its inability to be heat-treated without permanent deformation. This means that butyl liner sheets can’t be welded together; instead, seaming them is difficult and requires the use of liner glue or tape. Butyl also shares EPDM’s inferior chemical resistance. Unfortunately, butyl lacks the high strength that helps EPDM compensate for these shortcomings. Physically, butyl liners are quite weak, making them easy to rip and puncture. This is definitely worth keeping in mind if you’re looking to line a pond covered in rough substrate or which you expect to keep animals with sharper claws, like turtles. At the very least, you’ll have to invest in a strong, high-quality underlay to support a butyl liner.

In the US, butyl liners are fairly cheap (they cost an average of $0.50/square foot in the US, according to HomeAdvisor). In the UK, though, butyl rubber is becoming less common as the cost of the raw materials required to make it increase. As a result, UK prices can be as much as $2.87/square foot, and many UK manufacturers now only supply butyl liners for custom projects. Depending on where you live, butyl pond liner sheets can now be quite expensive, if they’re even available.

Butyl Liners
  • Very flexible and easy to fit different surfaces
  • Reliable in very high and low temperatures
  • Good UV, ozone, and weather resistance
  • Safe for fishponds
  • Inexpensive in the US
  • Very difficult to seam: can’t be welded, so pieces need to be joined together with adhesives
  • Poor chemical resistance
  • Physically weak; susceptible to punctures and tears
  • Expensive and becoming harder to find in the UK

Concluding Thoughts

No liner material is perfect, but all of the varieties listed here have advantages that could make them valuable additions to a variety of fish ponds, water gardens, and lakes. When you’re comparing liner materials from different manufacturers, though, remember that they’ll more than likely downplay those materials’ flaws, emphasizing only the benefits. Hopefully, this guide will help you shop smart and allow you to more accurately choose the correct liner material for your individual needs and circumstances!

Chris G
About the author

Chris G

Pond consultant and long-time hobbyist who enjoys writing in his spare time and sharing knowledge with other passionate pond owners. Experienced with pond installation, fish stocking, water quality testing, algae control and the troubleshooting of day-to-day pond related problems.

Read more about Pond Informer.

18 thoughts on “Comparison of Different Pond Liner Materials (Which Is Best?)”

  1. I’m working on a plan to start an aquaculture business and you’ve given me plenty to think about. Keep up the great work. I love how honest and thorough you are.
    Great work

  2. Hello, I want to know whether reinforced pond liner (RPE) and PVC membrane reinforced pond liner are the same or not. Because, I’m planning to buy new pond liner. After searching online and read your write up, I decided to buy reinforced polyethylene liner (RPE) . But while searching on eBay, I found PVC reinforced pond liner which I think is the same thing with reinforced pond liner (RPE).


    • Either product will work for a pond liner, however PVC is typically not fish safe and if you are not planning on backfilling dirt over the ENTIRE liner the life of the liner decreases considerably.

  3. Hi,
    This is an Informative post. You covered all the topics in single post. This post really very informative for those who wants to know about pond liner or hdpe lining.

  4. Hello,
    Thank you for this information. I have a pond liner that I’ve been using for about 3 years with no problems. I’m looking to buy another pond liner and attaching them together but because I bought it so long ago, I don’t remember what type it is. It is very flexible, wasn’t too expensive, seems to be durable, and, probably most telling, it has been welded together at the factory. Any suggestion as to what type of liner this is?
    Thank you

  5. Hi, Thanks for an informative explanation of different types of liners.
    After 23 years my PVC liner developed a slow leak. Typical water loss after filling was to my first shelf level at approx 12 inches. The shelf had a cemented brick containment wall .To find the leak i had to remove all coping stones around the pond ,empty the soil from the planting containment then break the brickwork out. First hole to appear was where a bean pole had been driven in.Not big enough for the water loss in a short period. The next was what i can only describe as a horizontal split approximately 4 inches long This was on a curved area between the wall and the shelf . This was an area under soil, under no physical stress and obviously not under duress from extreme temperature swings or ultra violet rays. So will be quite happy to replace it again with another PVC (fish pond approved) liner. The last liner had a 20 year guarantee, so no gripes there. My pond is only rectangular 2m x3m and on soft soil , no liner was used. Exposed liner is hard and very stiff but as yet has not cracked when pulled to check for damage.

    • Hi Ken,

      I’m glad you found the explanation helpful. It sounds like you had a tough time finding and fixing that leak! I hope your new PVC liner will last even longer. Thank you for sharing your experience and feedback with us.

  6. Good afternoon,
    Superlatives notwithstanding, an Excellent presentation.

    If I may indulge in a couple of questions regarding two large ponds, 8,750 sf and 14,000 sf each. These are located in Florida, (Tampa area), do not support fish but are visited by birds.

    Is there a means to ascertain the liner used when, thirty-years ago these ponds were constructed? For certain, the product is not HDPE or similar and given the liner is not buried it is not PVC. The existing material is thin, probably not more than 10-mils and closely conforms to the pond bottom.

    Secondly, given each pond is sizeable, do you feature a manufacturer can pre-fabricate say a fPP or Butyl type liners to facilitate installation?

    Any assistance you can provide is sincerely appreciated.


    • HI Stan,

      I am not the original poster of the information, but am well versed in liners of all types. 10 mils is very thin for a liner, most we use now are 30 to 45 mils thick. 14,000 sf is within the range of a fabricated panel. One of the more common materials on the market currently if LLDPE R Liner Low Density Polyethylene (reinforced). It runs about $0.65 per sf.
      The fPP is kind of uncommon as it is an unreinforced Polypropylene, You can get a fPPR which is a reinforced version but it is a little more expensive than the LLDPE R.

      There are a wide variety of liners out there and it can get confusing even for someone that works in the industry because each manufacture has their own “special material” which is typically just a tweak on an existing material.

      It may be possible if you send a sample of the liner or a picture that I can determine what it is, but not a guarantee.


      • Hi Bryant,

        Thank you for answering some comments and sharing your professional experience. That is indeed a tough one, as that is a very old installation. I would say that Stan could attempt to find/contact the original contractor or supplier who installed the ponds and ask for their records. However, given the age of the ponds, it may be difficult to find reliable information.

        Stan, you’re welcome to upload a picture and post in a new comment using a hosting service like this one:

        If you can get a clear image, maybe someone from our readership will be able to identify the material for you!

  7. I need to replace a 20-year-old, probably PVC liner that developed a slow leak. This was lining a preformed plastic goldfish pond from Lowes which itself developed a leak. Your description of Flexible Polypropylene, as a cross between strength, flexibility (very necessary), and temperature and UV protection, is intriguing but this material seems uncommon outside of large commercial suppliers. It is refreshing to find a site such as yours that isn’t trying to sell me something…but might anyone have recommendations of where to but fPP? I am in the USA.

    • Hi Todd,

      I am not the original poster, but you are correct on fPP and its availability.
      What you describe is rather small. EPDM may be your best option as you can order it on line from lots of different sites, even amazon I think.
      It is typical 45 mil thick and very rubbery, think old innertubes on bikes and cars. If you can just use a single piece without having to penetrate it with a pipe or anything it will form the best and stretch some what. It is on the more expensive side, running from $0.80 to $1.22 per sf.


    • Hi Todd,

      Thank you for your comment and kind words! I’m glad you found my description of Flexible Polypropylene (fPP) helpful. Yes, unfortunately, this material is rather uncommon outside of large commercial suppliers, but you may have some luck reaching out to pond suppliers who provide custom liner installations and asking if they may be able to order the material in. It’s a shame this material is so difficult to get within the hobby.

      Alternatively, you can also look for other types of flexible pond liners that are more widely available, such as EPDM or butyl. These are also strong, flexible and resistant to temperature and UV damage, but they can be a little more expensive than fPP (but since it’s so hard to find, I guess it doesn’t matter too much!).

      I hope this helps you find the best option for your pond. Please let me know if you have any questions or feedback.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.